Jev Ultrafast vs Codex

Two live browsers, one search. Watch both, inspect the results, then choose your favorite.

Jev UltrafastJev 1.13FreeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash handles text entry
CodexGPT-5.6 SolMediumFree

Search and filter

Start with a flight search.

Both agents start on Google Flights with the same browser size. The task stops at matching results, before any booking.

Task verification is shown separately from the agent’s own completion claim. A blocked page or incomplete search stays visible.

  • Watch live

    See both browser views together and expand either one. Viewing does not control the agent’s browser.

  • Inspect the work

    Compare current pages, actions, elapsed time and the matching search settings.

  • Compare metered costs

    Jev chooses browser actions; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supplies text-entry values. The free combo covers both models and browser usage until you vote or the free window ends.

Which option do users prefer?

2 tries · 0 votes · Same agents and models

No attributable votes for these agents and models yet. Try a real task and choose the result you prefer.

Recent user choices

See which results other people preferred. Their tasks and files stay private.

No public comparison records to show.

Model benchmarks

Artificial Analysis

Intelligence v4.3

General capability across the lab's whole suite.

Not published
47.1
Jev UltrafastJev 1.13

Coding

The coding subset of the same suite.

Not published
77.4
Jev UltrafastJev 1.13

Agentic

Tasks the model runs in several steps.

Not published
50.5
Jev UltrafastJev 1.13

These describe the model on its own, not the harness, the tools or the whole setup this page compares — and the lab runs each model at maximum effort, which is not what the composer above is set to. Scores are only comparable within one index version.

Source: Artificial Analysis — their published model index, taken 2026-09-16.

Agent performance on real tasks

Published Terminal-Bench 4.0 runs. Each result names its tested configuration.

Accuracy · Terminal-Bench 4.0

Percent of trials the whole configuration solved.

Not published
37.3%
Jev UltrafastJev Ultrafast · Jev 1.13
CodexCodex · GPT-5.6 Sol123 of 330 trials · max effort

The whisker is the 95% confidence interval. Two configurations whose whiskers overlap are not separated by this benchmark, however far apart their bars look.

Source: Terminal-Benchtheir published runs of a harness and model together, taken 2026-09-17.

Jev Ultrafast vs Codex: models, pricing and features

Compare these configurations on the same task, choose the result you prefer, then continue your chosen session. Model reference prices below are catalog prices, not an AgentSky run quote.

ConfigurationJev UltrafastCodex
ModelJev 1.13GPT-5.6 Sol
Thinking levelNot configurableMedium
CatalogJev UltrafastJev 1.13· Not listedCodexopenai/gpt-5.6-sol
Input$ / 1M tokens2.00
Output$ / 1M tokens10.00
Context windowtokens1.1M
Providers serving it3

List price for the model alone. What a run from this page costs also depends on the harness, the tools it calls and how long it works.

Source: OpenRouterthe open model catalog, taken 2026-09-17. A dash is something they do not publish for that option.

Frequently asked questions